linux: be better than ms-dos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents free software
Weight: 0.68
, mac
Weight: 0.67
, os
Weight: 0.67
, web browser
Weight: 0.66
, solaris
Weight: 0.57
Siblings freebsd
Weight: 0.58
, perl
Weight: 0.54
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, microsoft
Weight: 0.37
, apache
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than ms-dos 1.00
be better than vice-versa 1.00
be better than system 0.92
be better than other system 0.92
be much better than than pc 0.88
has quality better 0.86
be much better than windows 0.85
be much better than dells 0.84
be better than google 0.83
be seen as better 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mac, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mac, be much better than dells)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mac, be much better than dells)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mac, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mac, be much better than dells)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mac, be much better than windows)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mac, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(unix, has quality better)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be better than google)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mac, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mac, be much better than dells)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(microsoft, be better than google)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(microsoft, be better than google)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(unix, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(unix, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(linux, be better than ms-dos)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(linux, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(linux, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(linux, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(linux, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than windows)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than dells)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mac, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(microsoft, be better than google)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(unix, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than windows)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than dells)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mac, has quality better)