linux: be less popular than windows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents free software
Weight: 0.68
, mac
Weight: 0.67
, os
Weight: 0.67
, web browser
Weight: 0.66
, solaris
Weight: 0.57
Siblings freebsd
Weight: 0.58
, perl
Weight: 0.54
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, microsoft
Weight: 0.37
, apache
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less popular than windows 1.00
be better than windows 0.93
be than better windows 0.93
be than windows 0.93
be much better than windows 0.92
be much faster than windows 0.91
be faster than windows 0.91
be more stable than windows 0.91
be more reliable than windows 0.90
be more secure than windows 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mac, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mac, be faster than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mac, be more secure than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mac, be faster than windows)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mac, be better than windows)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mac, be faster than windows)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better than windows)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mac, be much better than windows)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(unix, be better than windows)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(unix, be more secure than windows)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mac, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mac, be faster than windows)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mac, be more secure than windows)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(unix, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(unix, be better than windows)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(unix, be more secure than windows)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(unix, be more secure than windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(linux, be than windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(linux, be more stable than windows)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(linux, be better than windows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(linux, be more stable than windows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(linux, be more stable than windows)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(linux, be than windows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(linux, be faster than windows)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more stable than windows)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(linux, be much faster than windows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(linux, be than better windows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(linux, be better than windows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(linux, be than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(linux, be than better windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(linux, be faster than windows)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(linux, be much faster than windows)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(linux, be than better windows)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(linux, be better than windows)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(linux, be than better windows)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(linux, be faster than windows)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(linux, be much faster than windows)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than windows)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(linux, be than windows)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(linux, be much faster than windows)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(linux, be faster than windows)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more secure than windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mac, be better than windows)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mac, be faster than windows)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than windows)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mac, be more secure than windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unix, be better than windows)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unix, be more secure than windows)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mac, be better than windows)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mac, be faster than windows)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than windows)