linux: be more reliable than windows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents free software
Weight: 0.68
, mac
Weight: 0.67
, os
Weight: 0.67
, web browser
Weight: 0.66
, solaris
Weight: 0.57
Siblings freebsd
Weight: 0.58
, perl
Weight: 0.54
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, microsoft
Weight: 0.37
, apache
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more reliable than windows 1.00
be more stable than windows 0.91
be less popular than windows 0.90
be more secure than windows 0.90
be better than windows 0.89
be than better windows 0.89
be much better than windows 0.88
be faster than windows 0.88
be much faster than windows 0.88
be than windows 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mac, be more secure than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mac, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mac, be faster than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mac, be faster than windows)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mac, be better than windows)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mac, be faster than windows)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better than windows)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mac, be much better than windows)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(unix, be more secure than windows)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(unix, be better than windows)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mac, be more secure than windows)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mac, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mac, be faster than windows)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(unix, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(unix, be better than windows)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(unix, be more secure than windows)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(unix, be more secure than windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more stable than windows)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(linux, be more stable than windows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(linux, be than windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(linux, be more stable than windows)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(linux, be than better windows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than windows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(linux, be more stable than windows)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(linux, be than windows)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(linux, be much faster than windows)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(linux, be faster than windows)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(linux, be than windows)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(linux, be better than windows)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(linux, be faster than windows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(linux, be less popular than windows)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(linux, be than windows)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(linux, be better than windows)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(linux, be much faster than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(linux, be than better windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(linux, be than better windows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(linux, be faster than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(linux, be than better windows)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(linux, be much faster than windows)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(linux, be better than windows)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(linux, be faster than windows)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(linux, be much faster than windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mac, be better than windows)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mac, be faster than windows)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unix, be better than windows)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unix, be more secure than windows)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mac, be better than windows)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mac, be faster than windows)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(linux, be more reliable than windows)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than windows)