lion: be suitable in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.62
, cat
Weight: 0.61
, species
Weight: 0.61
, predator
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiger
Weight: 0.70
, sea lion
Weight: 0.39
, elephant
Weight: 0.36
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.36
, panda bear
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be suitable in africa 1.00
live in africa 0.86
be endangered in africa 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(elephant, live in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(tiger, live in africa)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tiger, live in africa)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(elephant, live in africa)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(elephant, live in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(lion, be suitable in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lion, live in africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(lion, live in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lion, be endangered in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(lion, live in africa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lion, live in africa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(lion, be endangered in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lion, be endangered in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(lion, be endangered in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lion, be suitable in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lion, be suitable in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger, live in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lion, be suitable in africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(elephant, live in africa)