lip: be at kentucky fry chicken

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents skin
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
, sign
Weight: 0.56
Siblings eye
Weight: 0.62
, eyeliner
Weight: 0.45
, nose
Weight: 0.33
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.32
, chin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at kentucky fry chicken 1.00
be stir while they be be fry 0.78
be at bucket of chicken 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be stir while they be be fry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(skin, be at bucket of chicken)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(skin, be at bucket of chicken)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(thing, be stir while they be be fry)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(thing, be stir while they be be fry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(skin, be at bucket of chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be stir while they be be fry)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(skin, be at bucket of chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(thing, be stir while they be be fry)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(skin, be at bucket of chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(thing, be stir while they be be fry)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(lip, be at kentucky fry chicken)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(skin, be at bucket of chicken)