liquor: be illegal in alaska

Property	Similarity
be illegal in alaska	1.00
is illegal	0.81
be cheaper in california	0.78
be expensive in oregon	0.77
be cheaper in florida	0.77
be cheap in hampshire	0.76
be banned in bihar	0.75

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(liquor, is illegal)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(liquor, is illegal)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(liquor, is illegal)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(liquor, be banned in bihar)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(liquor, be banned in bihar)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(liquor, is illegal)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(liquor, be banned in bihar)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be banned in bihar)

Parents	alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.66 , beverage Weight: 0.61 , item Weight: 0.56 , problem Weight: 0.55 , industry Weight: 0.54
Siblings	vodka Weight: 0.70 , whiskey Weight: 0.65 , rum Weight: 0.63 , bourbon Weight: 0.58 , moonshine Weight: 0.52

liquor: be illegal in alaska

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings