liquor: get better with age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, industry
Weight: 0.54
Siblings vodka
Weight: 0.70
, whiskey
Weight: 0.65
, rum
Weight: 0.63
, bourbon
Weight: 0.58
, moonshine
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
get better with age 1.00
get with age 0.95
has quality better 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, get better with age)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, get with age)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(whiskey, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(whiskey, get better with age)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(whiskey, get with age)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(whiskey, get with age)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bourbon, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bourbon, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(liquor, get better with age)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(liquor, get with age)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(liquor, get with age)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(liquor, get with age)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get with age)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(liquor, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(liquor, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(liquor, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(liquor, get better with age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(whiskey, get better with age)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(whiskey, get with age)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bourbon, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality better)