lisp: be than dynamic languages

Property	Similarity
be than dynamic languages	1.00
be than other dynamic languages	0.99
be than faster dynamic languages	0.97
be than faster other dynamic languages	0.96
be than languages	0.93
be than other languages	0.92
be than faster languages	0.91
be than faster other languages	0.90
have many dialects	0.80
have dialects	0.80

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other languages)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster languages)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(lisp, be than languages)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than languages)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other languages)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than languages)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(lisp, have many dialects)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster languages)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(lisp, be than other languages)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(lisp, be than languages)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other languages)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster languages)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(lisp, have dialects)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other languages)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(lisp, have dialects)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(lisp, have dialects)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(lisp, be than other languages)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster languages)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(lisp, have many dialects)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other languages)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(lisp, have many dialects)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(lisp, have many dialects)

Parents	language Weight: 0.69 , programming language Weight: 0.67 , tool Weight: 0.54 , speech Weight: 0.49
Siblings	clojure Weight: 0.44 , english language Weight: 0.36 , italian language Weight: 0.35 , accent Weight: 0.35 , chinese language Weight: 0.35

lisp: be than dynamic languages

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible