lisp: be than other dynamic languages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.69
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, speech
Weight: 0.49
Siblings clojure
Weight: 0.44
, english language
Weight: 0.36
, italian language
Weight: 0.35
, accent
Weight: 0.35
, chinese language
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than other dynamic languages 1.00
be than dynamic languages 0.99
be than faster other dynamic languages 0.97
be than faster dynamic languages 0.96
be than other languages 0.94
be than languages 0.93
be than faster other languages 0.92
be than faster languages 0.91
have many dialects 0.81
have dialects 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lisp, be than languages)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than languages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(lisp, be than other languages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other languages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other languages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(lisp, have dialects)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lisp, be than languages)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lisp, have dialects)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lisp, have many dialects)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lisp, have many dialects)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lisp, have many dialects)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than languages)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lisp, have many dialects)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)