lisp: be than other languages

Property	Similarity
be than other languages	1.00
be than languages	0.98
be than faster other languages	0.95
be than other dynamic languages	0.94
be than faster languages	0.94
be than dynamic languages	0.92
be than faster other dynamic languages	0.91
be than faster dynamic languages	0.89
have many dialects	0.85
have dialects	0.84

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(lisp, be than languages)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than languages)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other languages)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other languages)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other languages)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster languages)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(lisp, have dialects)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster languages)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(lisp, be than languages)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster languages)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster languages)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other languages)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(lisp, have dialects)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(lisp, have dialects)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(lisp, have many dialects)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(lisp, have many dialects)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(lisp, have many dialects)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than languages)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(lisp, have many dialects)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)

Parents	language Weight: 0.69 , programming language Weight: 0.67 , tool Weight: 0.54 , speech Weight: 0.49
Siblings	clojure Weight: 0.44 , english language Weight: 0.36 , italian language Weight: 0.35 , accent Weight: 0.35 , chinese language Weight: 0.35

lisp: be than other languages

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible