lisp: have dialects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.69
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, speech
Weight: 0.49
Siblings clojure
Weight: 0.44
, english language
Weight: 0.36
, italian language
Weight: 0.35
, accent
Weight: 0.35
, chinese language
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have dialects 1.00
have many dialects 0.99
be than languages 0.85
be than other languages 0.84
be than other dynamic languages 0.80
be than dynamic languages 0.80
be than faster languages 0.79
be than faster other languages 0.79
be than faster other dynamic languages 0.76
be than faster dynamic languages 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lisp, have dialects)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lisp, have many dialects)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lisp, be than languages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than languages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than languages)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lisp, have many dialects)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(lisp, be than other languages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lisp, be than languages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lisp, have many dialects)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other languages)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other languages)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lisp, have many dialects)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other languages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(lisp, have dialects)