listen: be used to communicate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents work
Weight: 0.47
, guy
Weight: 0.46
, word
Weight: 0.41
, statement
Weight: 0.41
Siblings know
Weight: 0.30
, hear
Weight: 0.30
, think
Weight: 0.30
, stand
Weight: 0.29
, mike
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to communicate 1.00
be used to communicate with 0.98
be used to communicate idea 0.92
be used to communicate thought 0.91
be use together to communicate complex idea 0.85
be used to connect idea 0.79
be used to understand 0.78
be used to speak 0.78
be used to connect with peer 0.77
be motivated by communication be important 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(word, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(word, be used to communicate with)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(statement, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(word, be used to communicate thought)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(statement, be used to communicate idea)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(word, be used to speak)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(statement, be used to communicate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(word, be used to communicate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(word, be used to communicate with)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(statement, be used to communicate idea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(word, be used to communicate thought)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(word, be used to speak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(statement, be used to communicate)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to communicate)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to communicate with)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(statement, be used to communicate idea)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to communicate thought)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to speak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to connect idea)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to understand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(word, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(word, be used to communicate with)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(statement, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(word, be used to communicate thought)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(statement, be used to communicate idea)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(word, be used to speak)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(think, be used to connect idea)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(think, be used to connect idea)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(think, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(think, be used to understand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(listen, be used to communicate)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(listen, be motivated by communication be important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(listen, be used to understand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to understand)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(listen, be motivated by communication be important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(listen, be used to understand)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(listen, be motivated by communication be important)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(listen, be motivated by communication be important)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(listen, be used to communicate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(statement, be used to communicate)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate with)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(statement, be used to communicate idea)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate thought)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(word, be used to speak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(think, be used to understand)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(think, be used to connect idea)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(statement, be used to communicate)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate with)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(statement, be used to communicate idea)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate thought)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(listen, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(word, be used to speak)