listening: is high good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.54
, experience
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings loud music
Weight: 0.34
, talking
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.33
, communicating
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is high good 1.00
has quality good 0.83
is whilst high good 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
feel good 0.79
be in class good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, is high good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, is high good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, is high good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(loud music, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communicating, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(listening, is high good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(listening, is high good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(listening, is high good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(communicating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(communicating, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(loud music, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(loud music, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(listening, is high good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(listening, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(listening, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(listening, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(listening, is whilst high good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(listening, is whilst high good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(listening, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(listening, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(listening, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(listening, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(listening, be in class good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(listening, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(listening, is whilst high good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, be in class good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(listening, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(listening, feel good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(listening, be in class good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(listening, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(listening, feel good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(listening, is whilst high good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, is high good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(loud music, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(communicating, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, is high good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)