literature: be written in present tense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.63
, chapter
Weight: 0.63
, study
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
Siblings poetry
Weight: 0.36
, fiction
Weight: 0.34
, cinema
Weight: 0.34
, dictionary
Weight: 0.34
, poem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be written in present tense 1.00
is written 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(poem, is written)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poetry, is written)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poetry, is written)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poetry, is written)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(poem, is written)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(poem, is written)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(literature, be written in present tense)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(literature, is written)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(literature, is written)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(literature, is written)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(literature, is written)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(literature, be written in present tense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(literature, be written in present tense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(poem, is written)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(literature, be written in present tense)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(poetry, is written)