litter: is big problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big problem 1.00
has state problem 0.88
is big 0.86
be problem at school 0.83
is environmental problem 0.78
be problem in uk 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(garbage, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(litter, is big problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(litter, is big problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(garbage, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(garbage, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(trash, is big)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trash, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(garbage, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(litter, is big problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(litter, is big problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trash, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trash, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(trash, is big)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(trash, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(litter, is big problem)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(litter, has state problem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(litter, has state problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(litter, be problem at school)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(litter, be problem at school)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(litter, be problem at school)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(litter, is big)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(litter, has state problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem at school)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(litter, is big)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(litter, is big)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(litter, is environmental problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(litter, be problem in uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(litter, be problem in uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(litter, be problem in uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(litter, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(litter, is big problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trash, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(trash, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(litter, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)