litter: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be dangerous to animals 0.86
is harmful 0.79
have harmful 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(trash, be dangerous to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(litter, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(litter, is harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(litter, is harmful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(litter, is harmful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(litter, is harmful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(litter, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(litter, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(litter, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(trash, be dangerous to animals)