litter: is environmental problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is environmental problem 1.00
is environmental issue 0.93
is environmental 0.92
has state problem 0.80
is big problem 0.78
buried in landfill cause pollution water supply 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(garbage, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(garbage, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(garbage, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trash, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(garbage, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trash, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trash, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(litter, is environmental problem)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(litter, is environmental issue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental issue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(litter, is environmental)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(litter, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(litter, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(litter, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(litter, is big problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(litter, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(litter, is big problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(litter, is big problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trash, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)