live: be hard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents television show
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, show
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.57
, album
Weight: 0.55
Siblings talk show
Weight: 0.34
, game show
Weight: 0.33
, tv set
Weight: 0.32
, watch tv
Weight: 0.32
, entertainment
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard 1.00
causes hard 0.95
do not work well 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(live, be hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(live, be hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(live, be hard)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(live, causes hard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(live, causes hard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(live, causes hard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(live, causes hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(live, be hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(live, be hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(live, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)