liverpool: need third place

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.69
, port
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.57
, team
Weight: 0.57
Siblings manchester
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.36
, milan
Weight: 0.36
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.36
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need third place 1.00
was good place build 0.79
be good place live 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leeds, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(portsmouth, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, be good place live)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manchester, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(manchester, be good place live)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(leeds, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(leeds, be good place live)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(melbourne, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(melbourne, be good place live)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(milan, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(milan, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(liverpool, need third place)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(liverpool, be good place live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(liverpool, was good place build)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(liverpool, be good place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liverpool, was good place build)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(liverpool, be good place live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(liverpool, need third place)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(leeds, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(portsmouth, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(manchester, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(melbourne, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(milan, be good place live)