liverpool: was good place build

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.69
, port
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.57
, team
Weight: 0.57
Siblings manchester
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.36
, milan
Weight: 0.36
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.36
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good place build 1.00
be good place live 0.86
be good place visit 0.82
need third place 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(city, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liverpool, was good place build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(city, be good place visit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be good place visit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leeds, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(city, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(portsmouth, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manchester, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(manchester, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(leeds, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(leeds, be good place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(melbourne, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(melbourne, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(milan, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(milan, be good place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(milan, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(milan, be good place visit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(liverpool, was good place build)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(liverpool, be good place live)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(liverpool, be good place live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(liverpool, be good place live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(liverpool, be good place visit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, be good place live)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, be good place visit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(liverpool, need third place)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, need third place)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(liverpool, be good place visit)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(liverpool, be good place visit)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(liverpool, need third place)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(liverpool, need third place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liverpool, was good place build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(city, be good place visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(leeds, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(portsmouth, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(manchester, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(melbourne, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(milan, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(milan, be good place visit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(liverpool, was good place build)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(city, be good place visit)