living: be in new mexico

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.59
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.57
, necessity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings life
Weight: 0.32
, sanctuary
Weight: 0.32
, poverty
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in new mexico 1.00
be in rural mexico 0.89
be in texas 0.80
be in florida 0.80
be in colorado 0.80
be in california 0.80
be in pasadena california 0.80
be in oklahoma 0.79
be in louisiana 0.78
be in kansas wellington 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(living, be in new mexico)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(living, be in rural mexico)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(living, be in rural mexico)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(living, be in rural mexico)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(living, be in colorado)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(living, be in california)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(living, be in texas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(living, be in pasadena california)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(living, be in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(living, be in oklahoma)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(living, be in louisiana)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(living, be in texas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(living, be in colorado)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(living, be in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(living, be in california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(living, be in pasadena california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(living, be in oklahoma)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(living, be in colorado)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(living, be in california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(living, be in louisiana)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(living, be in texas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(living, be in oklahoma)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(living, be in florida)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(living, be in pasadena california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(living, be in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(living, be in pasadena california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(living, be in louisiana)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(living, be in oklahoma)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(living, be in colorado)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(living, be in florida)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(living, be in texas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(living, be in louisiana)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(living, be in new mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(living, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(living, be in new mexico)