living: be in rural mexico

Property	Similarity
be in rural mexico	1.00
be in new mexico	0.89
be in south america	0.81
be in nebraska	0.77
be in georgia	0.77
be in illinois	0.77
be in arizona	0.76
was i m missouri during war	0.76
be in kansas wellington	0.76
was through great depression better in iowa than chicago	0.76

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(living, be in new mexico)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(living, be in south america)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(living, be in georgia)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(living, be in nebraska)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(living, be in illinois)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(living, be in arizona)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(living, be in new mexico)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(living, be in south america)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(living, be in georgia)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(living, be in arizona)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(living, be in nebraska)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(living, be in illinois)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(living, be in arizona)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(living, be in illinois)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(living, be in nebraska)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(living, be in georgia)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(living, be in georgia)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(living, be in arizona)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(living, be in new mexico)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(living, be in illinois)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(living, be in nebraska)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(living, be in south america)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(living, be in new mexico)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(living, be in south america)

Parents	place Weight: 0.60 , crime Weight: 0.59 , experience Weight: 0.58 , term Weight: 0.57 , necessity Weight: 0.55
Siblings	life Weight: 0.32 , sanctuary Weight: 0.32 , poverty Weight: 0.32

living: be in rural mexico

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible