living: be in south america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.59
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.57
, necessity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings life
Weight: 0.32
, sanctuary
Weight: 0.32
, poverty
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in south america 1.00
be in rural mexico 0.81
be in texas 0.80
be in georgia 0.79
was i m missouri during war 0.78
be in florida 0.78
be in new mexico 0.78
was i m missouri during civil war 0.78
be in kansas wellington 0.78
was through great depression better in iowa than chicago 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(living, be in south america)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(living, be in rural mexico)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(living, be in rural mexico)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(living, be in georgia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(living, be in georgia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(living, be in texas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(living, be in texas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(living, be in florida)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(living, be in florida)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(living, be in rural mexico)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(living, be in new mexico)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(living, be in new mexico)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(living, be in georgia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(living, be in rural mexico)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(living, be in texas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(living, be in georgia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(living, be in texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(living, be in florida)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(living, be in new mexico)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(living, be in new mexico)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(living, be in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(living, be in south america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(living, be in south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(living, be in south america)