living: was through great depression better in iowa than chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.59
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.57
, necessity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings life
Weight: 0.32
, sanctuary
Weight: 0.32
, poverty
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was through great depression better in iowa than chicago 1.00
be in iowa 0.87
was i m missouri during war difficult 0.82
was i m missouri during war 0.82
be in oklahoma 0.82
be in arkansas 0.81
be in utah 0.81
be in illinois 0.81
be in nebraska 0.81
was i m missouri 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(living, be in utah)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(living, be in iowa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(living, be in oklahoma)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(living, be in arkansas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(living, be in nebraska)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(living, be in illinois)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(living, be in oklahoma)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(living, be in utah)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(living, be in oklahoma)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(living, be in illinois)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(living, be in iowa)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(living, be in nebraska)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(living, be in nebraska)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(living, be in illinois)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(living, be in arkansas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(living, be in iowa)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(living, be in utah)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(living, be in utah)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(living, be in oklahoma)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(living, be in arkansas)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(living, be in illinois)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(living, be in nebraska)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(living, be in arkansas)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(living, be in iowa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)