lizard: be beneficial to man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.80
, reptile
Weight: 0.76
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings komodo dragon
Weight: 0.74
, gila monster
Weight: 0.73
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.72
, iguana
Weight: 0.68
, toad
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to man 1.00
benefit man 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(toad, be beneficial to man)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(toad, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(toad, be beneficial to man)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(lizard, be beneficial to man)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(lizard, benefit man)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lizard, benefit man)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lizard, benefit man)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lizard, benefit man)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be beneficial to man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lizard, be beneficial to man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(toad, be beneficial to man)