llama: be better than alpacas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than alpacas 1.00
be called llamas 0.83
were called llamas 0.82
is llama 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, is llama)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(alpaca, is llama)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(alpaca, is llama)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(llama, be better than alpacas)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(llama, is llama)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(llama, is llama)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(llama, be called llamas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(llama, were called llamas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(llama, were called llamas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(llama, be called llamas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(llama, is llama)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(llama, were called llamas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(llama, be called llamas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(llama, be called llamas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(llama, were called llamas)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(llama, is llama)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(llama, be better than alpacas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(llama, be better than alpacas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(llama, be better than alpacas)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(alpaca, is llama)