llama: have big teeth

Related concepts

Parents	animal Weight: 0.77 , creature Weight: 0.62 , species Weight: 0.60 , sheep Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.55
Siblings	alpaca Weight: 0.39 , mountain goat Weight: 0.39 , prairie dog Weight: 0.38 , goat Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have big teeth	1.00
has physical part teeth	0.90
have bottom teeth	0.89
have big nostrils	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(sheep, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(llama, have big teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(sheep, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has physical part teeth)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(sheep, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(llama, have big teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(alpaca, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(alpaca, has physical part teeth)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(alpaca, have bottom teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(llama, have big teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(llama, has physical part teeth)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(llama, has physical part teeth)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(llama, has physical part teeth)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(llama, have bottom teeth)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(llama, have bottom teeth)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(llama, have bottom teeth)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(llama, have bottom teeth)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(llama, have big nostrils)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(llama, have big nostrils)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(llama, have big nostrils)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(llama, have big nostrils)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(llama, have big teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(llama, have big teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(sheep, has physical part teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(alpaca, has physical part teeth)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(alpaca, have bottom teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(llama, have big teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(sheep, has physical part teeth)