llama: have three stomachs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have three stomachs 1.00
have 3 stomachs 0.97
have long necks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have three stomachs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(alpaca, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(alpaca, have three stomachs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(alpaca, have long necks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(llama, have three stomachs)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(llama, have 3 stomachs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(llama, have 3 stomachs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(llama, have 3 stomachs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(llama, have 3 stomachs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(llama, have long necks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(llama, have long necks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(llama, have long necks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(llama, have long necks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(llama, have three stomachs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(alpaca, have three stomachs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alpaca, have long necks)