llama: were called llamas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
were called llamas 1.00
be called llamas 0.99
is llama 0.85
be better than alpacas 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, is llama)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(alpaca, is llama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(alpaca, is llama)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(llama, were called llamas)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(llama, is llama)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(llama, is llama)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(llama, be called llamas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(llama, be called llamas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(llama, be called llamas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(llama, be called llamas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(llama, is llama)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(llama, be better than alpacas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(llama, be better than alpacas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(llama, be better than alpacas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(llama, be better than alpacas)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(llama, is llama)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(llama, were called llamas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(llama, were called llamas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(llama, were called llamas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(alpaca, is llama)