load: be in electrical circuits lamps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, consideration
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings stress
Weight: 0.64
, ton
Weight: 0.50
, ohm
Weight: 0.40
, loading
Weight: 0.35
, throughput
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in electrical circuits lamps 1.00
be in circuit 0.76
actually work on cabling 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(throughput, actually work on cabling)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(throughput, actually work on cabling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(throughput, actually work on cabling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(load, be in electrical circuits lamps)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(load, be in circuit)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(load, be in circuit)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(load, be in circuit)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(load, be in circuit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(load, be in electrical circuits lamps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(load, be in electrical circuits lamps)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(load, be in electrical circuits lamps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(throughput, actually work on cabling)