loafer: be supposed fit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shoe
Weight: 0.64
, staple
Weight: 0.47
, flat
Weight: 0.44
, wardrobe
Weight: 0.40
, accessory
Weight: 0.39
Siblings oxford
Weight: 0.34
, sneaker
Weight: 0.33
, heel
Weight: 0.32
, nike
Weight: 0.32
, reebok
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be supposed fit 1.00
fit in comparison 0.79
be actually designed 0.78
fit in comparison to dress shoes 0.78
be supposed shiny 0.78
be intended for everyone 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(flat, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(loafer, be supposed fit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(flat, be supposed fit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(flat, be supposed fit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, fit in comparison to dress shoes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, fit in comparison)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(heel, be supposed fit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nike, be intended for everyone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(flat, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(loafer, be supposed fit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(heel, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(heel, be supposed fit)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sneaker, fit in comparison to dress shoes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sneaker, fit in comparison to dress shoes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sneaker, fit in comparison)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sneaker, fit in comparison)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(nike, be intended for everyone)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(nike, be intended for everyone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(loafer, be supposed fit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(loafer, be supposed fit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(flat, be supposed fit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sneaker, fit in comparison to dress shoes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(heel, be supposed fit)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sneaker, fit in comparison)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(nike, be intended for everyone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(loafer, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(flat, be supposed fit)