loan: assets to banks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt
Weight: 0.63
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.59
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings credit
Weight: 0.69
, asset
Weight: 0.68
, mortgage
Weight: 0.65
, contract
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
assets to banks 1.00
have for banks assets 0.99
be considered assets to banks 0.98
be important to banks 0.88
be considered assets 0.88
has quality assets 0.87
be more liquid than assets 0.84
decrease assets 0.83
be viewed as assets 0.82
be listed before assets 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed before assets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(credit, decrease assets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(asset, be more liquid than assets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(credit, decrease assets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(credit, decrease assets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(asset, be more liquid than assets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(asset, be more liquid than assets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(facility, be viewed as assets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(asset, be listed before assets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed before assets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(loan, assets to banks)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(loan, has quality assets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(loan, be considered assets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality assets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality assets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(loan, has quality assets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(loan, be important to banks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loan, be important to banks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(loan, be important to banks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loan, assets to banks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(credit, decrease assets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(asset, be more liquid than assets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(asset, be listed before assets)