loan: be important to banks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt
Weight: 0.63
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.59
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings credit
Weight: 0.69
, asset
Weight: 0.68
, mortgage
Weight: 0.65
, contract
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to banks 1.00
have for banks assets 0.89
assets to banks 0.88
be considered assets to banks 0.88
is one bank 0.84
work at bank 0.82
is one bank calling 0.77
be important between companies 0.77
be defined in banking 0.76
work in reserve banking system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(credit, is one bank calling)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(credit, be defined in banking)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between companies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(contract, be important between companies)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, be important between companies)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(credit, be defined in banking)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(credit, be defined in banking)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(credit, is one bank calling)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(credit, is one bank calling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(loan, be important to banks)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(loan, assets to banks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(loan, work at bank)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(loan, work at bank)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(loan, assets to banks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loan, assets to banks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(loan, work in reserve banking system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, work at bank)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(loan, work in reserve banking system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(loan, work at bank)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(loan, work in reserve banking system)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(loan, work in reserve banking system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loan, be important to banks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(credit, be defined in banking)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(contract, be important between companies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(credit, is one bank calling)