loan: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt
Weight: 0.63
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.59
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings credit
Weight: 0.69
, asset
Weight: 0.68
, mortgage
Weight: 0.65
, contract
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be good 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for country 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
be bad for company 0.79
has quality price 0.78
be good for business 0.76
be good for country 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bridge loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(debt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(debt, be good for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(debt, be good for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(debt, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(debt, be bad for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for company)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, is bad thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for country)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for country)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for country)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(debt, is bad thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(credit, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(credit, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bridge loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(debt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(debt, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(debt, be good for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(debt, be good for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(debt, be bad for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(credit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(credit, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(credit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(credit, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(mortgage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(mortgage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mortgage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(contract, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(loan, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(loan, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(loan, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(debt, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, is bad thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debt, be good for country)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(debt, be good for country)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(credit, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(credit, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(debt, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, is bad thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debt, be good for country)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(debt, be good for country)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)