loan: is illiquid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt
Weight: 0.63
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.59
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings credit
Weight: 0.69
, asset
Weight: 0.68
, mortgage
Weight: 0.65
, contract
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is illiquid 1.00
be less risky than equity 0.78
be riskier than equity 0.78
assets to banks 0.76
have for banks assets 0.76
be considered assets to banks 0.76
qualify as securities 0.76
be listed in order of liquidity 0.75
be important to investors 0.75
be more expensive than equity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(loan, is illiquid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(loan, is illiquid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(loan, is illiquid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(asset, be important to investors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(loan, is illiquid)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(loan, is illiquid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(loan, is illiquid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(asset, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(asset, be important to investors)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(loan, is illiquid)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(loan, qualify as securities)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(loan, qualify as securities)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loan, assets to banks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(loan, qualify as securities)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(loan, assets to banks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(loan, assets to banks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, qualify as securities)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(loan, is illiquid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(asset, be important to investors)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(loan, is illiquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)