lobster: be best thing eat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crustacean
Weight: 0.74
, shellfish
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings crab
Weight: 0.39
, shrimp
Weight: 0.39
, hermit crab
Weight: 0.38
, scallop
Weight: 0.37
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best thing eat 1.00
eat 0.84
eat food 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(crustacean, eat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lobster, be best thing eat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(crustacean, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crustacean, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(crab, eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(crustacean, eat)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lobster, be best thing eat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(shrimp, eat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(shrimp, eat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(crab, eat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crab, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lobster, be best thing eat)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lobster, eat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(lobster, eat food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lobster, eat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lobster, eat food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lobster, eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(lobster, eat food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lobster, eat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lobster, eat food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lobster, be best thing eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crustacean, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(shrimp, eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(crab, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(lobster, be best thing eat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crustacean, eat)