local: is food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neighborhood
Weight: 0.53
, work
Weight: 0.52
, volunteer
Weight: 0.51
, visitor
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.51
Siblings greenwich village
Weight: 0.32
, other person
Weight: 0.31
, south park
Weight: 0.30
, homeless person
Weight: 0.30
, municipality
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is food 1.00
is food better 0.91
is sustainable food 0.84
be healthier food 0.82
is sustainable food better 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(local, is food)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(local, is sustainable food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(local, is food better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(local, be healthier food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(local, is sustainable food better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(local, is food better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(local, is food better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(local, is food better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(local, is sustainable food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(local, is sustainable food better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(local, be healthier food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(local, is sustainable food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(local, is sustainable food better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(local, be healthier food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(local, is sustainable food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(local, is sustainable food better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(local, be healthier food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(local, is food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(local, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(local, is food)