location: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, spot
Weight: 0.66
, historical site
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.77
, construction site
Weight: 0.75
, central park
Weight: 0.71
, apartment building
Weight: 0.70
, shopping mall
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be for business 0.95
be for business important 0.94
be important for business 0.94
be important in business 0.92
be important to business person 0.85
setting up new business 0.80
setting up business 0.79
be most important aspect of business 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(consideration, be important to business person)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important to business person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important to business person)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(consideration, be important to business person)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(location, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(location, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(location, be for business important)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(location, be important for business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(location, be important in business)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(location, be for business important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(location, be important for business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(location, be important in business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(location, be for business important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(location, be important in business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(location, be important for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(location, setting up new business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(location, be important in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(location, be important for business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(location, be for business important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(location, setting up new business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(location, setting up new business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(location, setting up new business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(location, be most important aspect of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consideration, be important to business person)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(location, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consideration, be important to business person)