locker room: have best lighting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents room
Weight: 0.72
, space
Weight: 0.72
, classroom
Weight: 0.65
, bathroom
Weight: 0.64
Siblings locker
Weight: 0.61
, laundry room
Weight: 0.39
, hotel room
Weight: 0.39
, dining room
Weight: 0.38
, clean room
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have best lighting 1.00
have lighting 0.96
have bad lighting 0.96
have harsh lighting 0.88
have best light 0.83
have lights 0.83
have black lights 0.79
have red lights 0.78
have blue lights 0.78
lack lights 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bathroom, have best light)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bathroom, have blue lights)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bathroom, have red lights)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bathroom, have black lights)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(room, have red lights)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(room, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(room, have lighting)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(room, have bad lighting)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have best light)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have black lights)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(room, have red lights)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have red lights)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have blue lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(room, have bad lighting)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(room, have red lights)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have black lights)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have blue lights)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have red lights)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(room, have lighting)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have best light)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, lack lights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bathroom, have best light)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(room, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bathroom, have blue lights)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bathroom, have red lights)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bathroom, have black lights)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(room, have red lights)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hotel room, lack lights)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hotel room, lack lights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(locker room, have best lighting)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(locker room, have lighting)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(locker room, have lighting)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(locker room, have lighting)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have lighting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(locker room, have best lighting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(room, have lighting)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(room, have bad lighting)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bathroom, have best light)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bathroom, have black lights)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, have red lights)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bathroom, have red lights)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bathroom, have blue lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hotel room, lack lights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(room, have lighting)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(room, have bad lighting)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bathroom, have best light)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bathroom, have black lights)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, have red lights)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bathroom, have red lights)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(locker room, have best lighting)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bathroom, have blue lights)