locust: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.64
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.54
, animal
Weight: 0.51
, artist
Weight: 0.50
, species
Weight: 0.48
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.35
, apple tree
Weight: 0.35
, acacia
Weight: 0.34
, maple tree
Weight: 0.34
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
get bad 0.84
has quality bad 0.79
be compared with bad weather 0.78
come 7 years 0.76
come 17 years 0.76
come out few years 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(locust, be bad year)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(locust, come out few years)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(locust, come out few years)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(locust, come out few years)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, get bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(locust, come out few years)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(locust, come 17 years)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, be compared with bad weather)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(locust, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(locust, come 7 years)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(locust, come 17 years)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(locust, get bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(locust, come 17 years)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(locust, come 7 years)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(locust, come 17 years)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(locust, be compared with bad weather)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(locust, come 7 years)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(locust, be compared with bad weather)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(locust, get bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(locust, come 7 years)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(locust, be compared with bad weather)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(locust, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(locust, get bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(locust, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(locust, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(locust, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(locust, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(locust, be bad year)