locust: be compared with bad weather

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.64
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.54
, animal
Weight: 0.51
, artist
Weight: 0.50
, species
Weight: 0.48
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.35
, apple tree
Weight: 0.35
, acacia
Weight: 0.34
, maple tree
Weight: 0.34
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be compared with bad weather 1.00
be compared with weather 0.98
be bad year 0.78
get bad 0.77
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(locust, be compared with bad weather)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(locust, be compared with weather)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(locust, be compared with weather)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(locust, be compared with weather)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(locust, be compared with weather)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(locust, be bad year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(locust, be bad year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, get bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(locust, be bad year)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(locust, be bad year)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(locust, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(locust, get bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(locust, get bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(locust, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(locust, get bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(locust, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(locust, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(locust, be compared with bad weather)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(locust, be compared with bad weather)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, be compared with bad weather)