locust: get bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.64
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.54
, animal
Weight: 0.51
, artist
Weight: 0.50
, species
Weight: 0.48
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.35
, apple tree
Weight: 0.35
, acacia
Weight: 0.34
, maple tree
Weight: 0.34
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get bad 1.00
be bad year 0.84
has quality bad 0.83
be compared with bad weather 0.77
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, get bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(species, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(locust, get bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(locust, get bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(locust, be bad year)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(locust, be bad year)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(locust, be bad year)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(locust, be bad year)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(locust, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(locust, be compared with bad weather)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(locust, be compared with bad weather)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(locust, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(locust, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, be compared with bad weather)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(locust, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(locust, be compared with bad weather)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(locust, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(locust, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(locust, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(locust, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(locust, get bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(locust, get bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(locust, get bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)