logic: be considered art of reasoning

Property	Similarity
be considered art of reasoning	1.00
art of reasoning	0.97
be considered art	0.85
be effective tool in reasoning	0.83
be called logic	0.81
go by logic	0.80
is art	0.80
be considered science	0.77
be necessary for study of philosophy	0.76
be important in philosophy	0.75

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(logic, art of reasoning)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(logic, art of reasoning)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(logic, be called logic)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered art)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(logic, go by logic)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(logic, be called logic)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(logic, art of reasoning)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(logic, go by logic)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(logic, is art)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(logic, be necessary for study of philosophy)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(logic, art of reasoning)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in philosophy)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(logic, be considered art)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(logic, go by logic)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(logic, be considered art)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(logic, be considered art)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(logic, be called logic)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(logic, be considered science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(logic, is art)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(logic, go by logic)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(logic, be considered science)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(logic, is art)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(logic, is art)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(logic, be considered science)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(logic, be called logic)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(logic, be important in philosophy)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(logic, be necessary for study of philosophy)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(logic, be important in philosophy)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(logic, be necessary for study of philosophy)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(logic, be important in philosophy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(logic, be necessary for study of philosophy)

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.65 , concept Weight: 0.64 , factor Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.60
Siblings	boolean algebra Weight: 0.63 , point Weight: 0.63 , prolog Weight: 0.49 , multiplexer Weight: 0.48 , theory Weight: 0.35

logic: be considered art of reasoning

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible