logic: be considered science

Property	Similarity
be considered science	1.00
is science	0.93
be important in computer science	0.86
be required by sciences	0.80
be considered art	0.79
be considered art of reasoning	0.77
be important in math	0.75

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(logic, be considered art)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(logic, is science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(logic, be considered art)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(logic, be considered art)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(logic, is science)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(logic, is science)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(logic, be required by sciences)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(logic, be important in computer science)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in math)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(logic, is science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(logic, be required by sciences)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(logic, be required by sciences)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(logic, be important in computer science)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered art)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(logic, be important in math)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(logic, be required by sciences)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(logic, be important in math)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(logic, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(logic, be important in math)

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.65 , concept Weight: 0.64 , factor Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.60
Siblings	boolean algebra Weight: 0.63 , point Weight: 0.63 , prolog Weight: 0.49 , multiplexer Weight: 0.48 , theory Weight: 0.35

logic: be considered science

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

Remarkability from parent implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

Typicality inheritance from parent to child