logic: be effective tool in reasoning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.65
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boolean algebra
Weight: 0.63
, point
Weight: 0.63
, prolog
Weight: 0.49
, multiplexer
Weight: 0.48
, theory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be effective tool in reasoning 1.00
be considered art of reasoning 0.83
art of reasoning 0.82
be called logic 0.79
go by logic 0.77
is useful 0.75
be necessary for study of philosophy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(concept, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(theory, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(theory, is useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(theory, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(logic, art of reasoning)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(logic, be called logic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(logic, be called logic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(logic, art of reasoning)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(logic, go by logic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(logic, go by logic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(logic, be necessary for study of philosophy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logic, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(logic, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(logic, go by logic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(logic, art of reasoning)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(logic, be called logic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(logic, go by logic)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(logic, art of reasoning)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(logic, is useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(logic, is useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(logic, be called logic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(logic, be necessary for study of philosophy)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(logic, be necessary for study of philosophy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(logic, be necessary for study of philosophy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)