logic: be important in computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.65
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boolean algebra
Weight: 0.63
, point
Weight: 0.63
, prolog
Weight: 0.49
, multiplexer
Weight: 0.48
, theory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in computer science 1.00
is science 0.90
be considered science 0.86
be important in math 0.80
be required by sciences 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(logic, be important in computer science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(logic, be important in computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(logic, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(logic, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(logic, be considered science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(logic, be considered science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(logic, be required by sciences)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(logic, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(logic, be important in math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(logic, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(logic, be required by sciences)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(logic, be important in math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(logic, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(logic, be required by sciences)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(logic, be important in math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in math)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(logic, be required by sciences)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(logic, be important in computer science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(logic, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)