logic: is pro better than garageband

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.65
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boolean algebra
Weight: 0.63
, point
Weight: 0.63
, prolog
Weight: 0.49
, multiplexer
Weight: 0.48
, theory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is pro better than garageband 1.00
is pro x expensive 0.84
is pro x 0.84
is pro x slow 0.84
is pro x quiet 0.82
is pro x cheap 0.81
is pro x lagging 0.80
is pro x crashing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(logic, is pro better than garageband)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(logic, is pro x)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(logic, is pro x slow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(logic, is pro x expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(logic, is pro x lagging)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(logic, is pro x)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(logic, is pro x slow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(logic, is pro x crashing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(logic, is pro x slow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(logic, is pro x cheap)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(logic, is pro x cheap)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(logic, is pro x)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(logic, is pro x slow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(logic, is pro x crashing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(logic, is pro x expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(logic, is pro x lagging)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(logic, is pro x cheap)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(logic, is pro x cheap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(logic, is pro x)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(logic, is pro x crashing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(logic, is pro x expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(logic, is pro x lagging)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(logic, is pro x expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(logic, is pro x lagging)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(logic, is pro x crashing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(logic, is pro better than garageband)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(logic, is pro better than garageband) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(logic, is pro better than garageband)