logo: be important for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.64
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.64
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
, design
Weight: 0.62
Siblings name
Weight: 0.35
, banner
Weight: 0.35
, sticker
Weight: 0.34
, sweatshirt
Weight: 0.34
, brand
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for business 1.00
be important to company 0.84
be important for advertising 0.77
is most important 0.77
be important in advertising 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(logo, be important for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important for advertising)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(design, be important for advertising)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(name, is most important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(logo, be important for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(name, is most important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(name, is most important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(logo, be important for business)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(logo, be important to company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(logo, be important to company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(logo, be important to company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(logo, be important for advertising)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(logo, is most important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(logo, be important in advertising)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(logo, be important for advertising)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(logo, is most important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(logo, be important for advertising)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important to company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(logo, be important in advertising)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(logo, is most important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(logo, be important in advertising)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for advertising)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(logo, is most important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important in advertising)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(logo, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important for advertising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(name, is most important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important for advertising)