london: be warmer than keswick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be warmer than keswick 1.00
be warmer than aberdeen 0.93
have warmer winter temperatures than montreal 0.89
be warmer than russia 0.88
have warmer winter than new york 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than keswick)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(london, be warmer than keswick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(london, be warmer than keswick)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than aberdeen)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(london, be warmer than aberdeen)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than russia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(london, be warmer than russia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(london, be warmer than aberdeen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than aberdeen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(london, be warmer than russia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than russia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(london, have warmer winter than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than keswick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than keswick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(london, be warmer than keswick)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)