london: have high population density

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high population density 1.00
have dense population 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(london, have high population density)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, have high population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, have high population density)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(london, have high population density)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(london, have high population density)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(london, have dense population)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(london, have dense population)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(london, have dense population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(london, have high population density)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(london, have high population density)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new york, have high population density)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(london, have high population density)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new york, have high population density)